Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kokkale
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Kokkalai. Sandstein 20:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Kokkale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources are not WP:Reliable. No indication that this is a real geographical area as noted elsewhere (neutrally) and not simply a residential subdivision or a sales tract. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- The sources mention this area only in passing and do not indicate any WP:Notability. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 12:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect Kokkalai Ref 2 spells it thus and shows it as ward 39, not 35 (ref 1 is a dead link): Noyster (talk), 11:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect there doesn't seem to be anything to merge. Smmurphy(Talk) 14:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.