Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marģers Krams (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marģers Krams

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

last AfD had no participants. Fails WP:BIO. No inherent notability in being ambassador. Limited coverage just confirms held role LibStar (talk) 11:05, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being an ambassador on its own is not enough to make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ambassadors are not automatically notable, and my searches [1], [2] brought up nothing beyond evidence of a professional diplomat doing his job.E.M.Gregory (talk) 05:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.