Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Scenarios
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 10:29, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- Pop Scenarios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has no references, and I don't believe it meets the WP:GNG. I couldn't find anything beyond fansites. Random86 (talk) 03:16, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 03:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass WP:GNG. A google search shows unconnected fan sites. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.