Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mateusz Ponitka
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:51, 21 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 14:51, 21 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:23, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mateusz Ponitka[edit]
- Mateusz Ponitka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:Crystal. Nice that he should be drafted by the NBA but by now the article fails to proof that he even played at senior level professional basketball (only college basketball) Night of the Big Wind talk 13:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now. According to this sports site (which is run by USA Today) he plays in the Polish second division and he has not been selected in the NBA Draft yet. Fails WP:NBASKETBALL. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 17:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:18, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:18, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:18, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and possible userfy. It may be worth saving this for the day when he gets drafted (if he does at all), but he's not notable yet. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.