Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perianal hair
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 21:41, 29 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 21:41, 29 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 03:04, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Looks like a hoax and is not verifiable Joelmills 20:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep this does seem to get some on-point google hits, but urgently needs cleanup. Yuck. Sandstein 21:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "Occasionally faecal matter can reside on the 'feet' of the 'spiders', and form difficult to remove lumps, which have amusing names such as:- dangleberries - with the 'poo' forming the body of the 'fruit' and the hair the stem; toffee strings - due to the sometimes sticky/adhesive properties of toffee; bum conkers - the small brown balls resemble conkers on strings" Absolutely, completely and utterly ridiculous. Aplomado - UTC 21:24, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary. A real term. See, for example [1], or [2]. Revolting, though. Slowmover 21:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki the definition, and junk the disgusting ramble. -- Mithent 23:56, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A low-humour BJaoDN entry? Hynca-Hooley 01:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN. Haikupoet 03:56, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as patent nonsense. If someone wants to write an actual encyclopedic article on the subject, they'd be better off starting from scratch than with this. (BTW, commentators should be aware that "BJAODN" is not necessarily considered a Delete vote by closing admins, and in fact may be interpreted as, effectively, a Keep vote, so if Delete is meant comentators should say so.) Herostratus 15:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Herostratus --Icarus 09:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.