Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mikegooderson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:39, 4 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mikegooderson}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Mikegooderson[edit]


 Confirmed that Mikegooderson and Coldwinterday are the same user.

Olivespread is  Possible.

Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Blocked Coldwinterday (confirmed) and Olivespread (suspected/probable based on behavior) indefinitely and blocked Mikegooderson for 48 hours. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Olivespread has protested his/her innocence and, taken with the "possible" checkuser result, I have unblocked. Please advise if the technical evidence was stronger than implied here. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are factors that prevent me from ruling it out. The technical evidence is certainly not enough to base a block on. In retrospect, a better answer would have been  Inconclusive. Apologies for the infelicitous phrasing. Sam Korn (smoddy) 20:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Coincidences can and do happen. But I confess that Mikegooderson (talk · contribs) accidentally becoming aware of The Sufis – a then-orphaned new article – within 7 minutes of its being created by a first-time editor somehow strikes me as a long shot. Still, in dubio pro reo and all that. Thanks, Jayen466 21:02, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.