Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirk Jackson
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:47, 14 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:47, 14 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense vandalism from vandal account. Claims made in the article, such as that he coauthored the steady state theory with Hoyle and Bondi are false. Joke 22:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete –Joke 22:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax. --Dhartung | Talk 23:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoaxalicious. Danny Lilithborne 23:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He would have been 16 when the steady state theory was developed. Hoax. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom. Chris Kreider 23:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Looks like an similary named article Kirck jackson was just deleted earlier today. Speedily actually. Is this on par with that deletion? Chris Kreider 00:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Response I speedily deleted an article called Kirk jackson which had exactly the same content as this article. I didn't see any reason for the article's existence, or any reason to discuss the deletion, since one under the appropriate name already existed. I don't see any reason this article can be speedied, though, even though it seems obvious that it is a hoax. –Joke 00:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Looks like an similary named article Kirck jackson was just deleted earlier today. Speedily actually. Is this on par with that deletion? Chris Kreider 00:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.