Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Big Fish Games
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:25, 14 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:25, 14 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Big Fish Games. John Vandenberg 05:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My Big Fish Games[edit]
- My Big Fish Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Advertisement for a section of a pay-to-play game site, Big Fish Games. Italiavivi 19:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge to Big Fish Games. Fails WP:WEB notability guidelines, and risks being an advertisement due to Big Fish Games being a pay-to-play site. Italiavivi 19:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep . The site meets WP:WEB, per criteria #1 "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. " The article references an in-depth review of the new site, from the The Wall Street Journal, which was reprinted in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, as well as an article describing the new service from MSNBC, which itself is an Associated Press story, that was picked up and published by other outlets, such as USA Today [1]. I also doubt that an article which referenced criticism of the site as a multi-level marketing scheme could be mistaken for an advertisement. Isarig 19:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep satisfies guideline, per Isarig. Bigglove 00:56, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Satisfies guidelines and isn't pushing product. Wikipedia isn't paper.--G-Dett 01:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Big Fish Games. I could see an article on this, but not two (or three, counting Big Fish Studios). Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - the guidelines seem to be met, so we could merge it with Big Fish Studios, as mentionned above. It should certainly not be deleted at all. Lradrama 13:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Andrew above. This is unnecessary as a standalone. Eusebeus 15:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge it with the general entry for Big Fish. That's all the Cakemaniacs deserve. --Hanging Jack 18:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge any notable content and delete. csloat 17:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as fails notability criteria of WP:WEB. --Gavin Collins 10:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as it seems to satisfy notability of WP:WEB. If desired, Merge relevant content to Big Fish Games and Redirect there. --Craw-daddy | T | 10:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.