Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disinformation (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 12:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disinformation (album)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think the album itself meets notability criteria from WP:NALBUM. Tow (talk) 15:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Tow (talk) 15:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Definitely non-notable, the only true review is by AllMusic - the rests are reviews of the whole group (or small parts of album reviews, such as the one by Robert Christgau). Réunion (talk to me) 16:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or, maybe better, redirect – In full disclosure: I didn't start the article, but added RS references to it last July. In addition to the cited RS, there are also mentions in another NYT article, from 1999, in a few early 2000s Akron Beacon Journal articles, and in a few Ralph Carney obits. Caro7200 (talk) 20:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think redirect would be a good option, probably better than deleting the article if someone actually wants to know where it's gone. Maybe we can incorporate something in this article in the Tin Huey page. Réunion (talk to me) 22:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Appears the sources mostly cover the band or artists themselves rather than this album. I feel a redirect is the ideal solution for this case. Tow (talk) 03:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NALBUM with sources added to the article by Caro. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 00:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon (talk) 06:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain User:力 (powera, π, ν) 22:44, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.