Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gloria Martinson
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 00:17, 4 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 23:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gloria Martinson[edit]
- Gloria Martinson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Aside from an award by a former Mississippi governor and aside from being the grandmother of actress Lauren Jones (which is also the user name of the creator of the article), I see nothing notable for inclusion. - ℅ ✰ALLST☆R✰ echo 00:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 00:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Borderline, but I don't see any harm in having this article. --Ryan Delaney talk 00:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- keep I think that she is notable but agree its a weak keep - this said she is from the refernces a notable philanthropist having set up charitable organisations. I go with Borderline and say might as well keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hollowinsideandout (talk • contribs) 08:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.