Template talk:Taxonomy/Viperinae

/* Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2022 */ new section

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected template at Template:Taxonomy/Viperinae.
(edit · history · last · links · transclusion count · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Subfamily viperinae should be causinae https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=634411#null 199.87.130.130 (talk) 12:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Until relatively recently, two other genera were also included in the Viperinae. However, they were eventually considered so distinctive within the Viperidae, that separate subfamilies were created for them:

Genus Azemiops - moved to subfamily Azemiopinae by Liem, Marx & Rabb (1971). Genus Causus - recognition of subfamily Causinae Cope, 1860 was proposed by Groombridge (1987) and further supported by Cadle (1992). Nevertheless, these groups, together with the genera currently recognized as belonging to the Viperinae, are still often referred to collectively as the true vipers.

From this article Amadeus²² 🙋 🔔 15:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]