Talk:Interstate 476/GA1
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This review is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
Examples include "a reduced design built due to local environmental concerns", "8 miles (13 km) south of the toll barrier" (sentences should not begin with a numeral, rather, it should be spelled out).
- B. MoS compliance:
Introduction is too short, and does not sufficiently summarize the article, please see WP:LEAD for more info. Article also includes "peacock terms" such as "bisecting the famous Main Line at U.S. Route 30, where the highway is adorned with such visual roadside treats".
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Some paragraphs are lacking citations.
- C. No original research:
Unreferenced statements may contain original research.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Article will be placed on hold until issues can be addressed. If an editor does not express interest in addressing these issues within seven days, the article will be delisted.--ErgoSum•talk•trib 23:59, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- I have made some improvements to the article including expanding the lead and rewriting the route description a bit. Dough4872 (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- It looks good, what happened to the control cities? I think its been improved enough, thanks to User:Dough4872 and User:Spikebrennan. I'm impressed. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 03:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- I have made some improvements to the article including expanding the lead and rewriting the route description a bit. Dough4872 (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)