Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adewale Adetona (2nd nomination)

Adewale Adetona

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:GNG. Sourced to sponsored posts. Princess of Ara 04:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, Technology, and Nigeria. Princess of Ara 04:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Princess of Ara: I believe that this page should not be deleted because it has significant coverage that satisfies WP:GNG. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to work on the article as extensively as I'd like to; to prove it's qualification. I'd be glad if allowed more time to work on it and if the article is left to remain on the main wiki space for as long as it's being improved (and with a new tag that governs this new stance). The article is less than 24 hours old and as we know "many good articles start their Wiki life in pretty bad shape". I believe a talk page message outlining some improvements or a WP:TC tag is more appropriate than a deletion proposal. Please let me know if there are any specific guidelines that you'd like to see me improve upon in the upcoming days. Thank you for your help. Regards. Newliving (talk) 06:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've added 7 additional references to this article. @Princess of Ara: Take a look at your earliest convenience. Regards. Newliving (talk) 10:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It is not uncommon for brand influencers to have coverage is reliable sources. But Wikipedia will only consider those coverage that are independent and significant, and I am not seeing that. HandsomeBoy (talk) 14:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 22:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Press releases and interviews, does not meet the general notability guidelines. --Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 09:03, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Press releasing! —Natalie RicciNatalie 00:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I believe this article was nominated for deletion prematurely; as most of the objections have been improved upon. The sources that featured press releases or non-independent sources have been removed; thanks to the information left in some of these votes from more veteran editors. I welcome any improvement to the article and await a decision. Regards. Newliving (talk) 15:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[[#ref_{{{1}}}|^]] This is the page creator.[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss the creator's impovements which have not been addressed by those who voted before they were made
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article now only has 4 sources listed, not really notable. Oaktree b (talk) 05:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A simple Google search reveals notability. Research is still being done and sources are still being added; help appreciated via talk page.