Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Blankenhorn (2nd nomination)
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 20:10, 19 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete As per consensus. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:17, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dana Blankenhorn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unclear claims of notability, no references to assert it either. Does not meet wp:creative Omarcheeseboro (talk) 23:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm the original author of this article. I started to clean this article up but, on further reflection, it seems that the are, in fact, verifiability issues. Most of the available sources appear to be profiles and bios that Blankenhorn himself likely wrote. Let's go ahead and delete it. Szarka (talk) 00:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - pretty much all sources are online profiles.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 23:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.