User talk:Scullin

Welcome!

Hello Scullin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lectonar 07:13, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Satellite.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Satellite.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much.

It als is a bad name Stuyvesant_Town_Satellite.jpg would have been better. Zeimusu | Talk page 08:16, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Request for assistance on a consulting project

Scullin--

I work for a company called Gerson Lehrman Group, one of the largest providers of independent research. We manage the GLG Councils (www.glgcouncils.com) and are starting our own Wiki and launching several collaborative research projects using Wiki technology. [We will NOT be making entries on Wikipedia.] If you are interested in particpating in a paid opportunity to work on a project related to your knowledge of the Aggregates industry, please email me at your earliest convenience at mmayes@glgroup.com - Thank you for your interest in GLG. We look forward to working with you. Best, Mike

NRAM

I don't dispute that the technology in question is highly theoretical, but it seems no more so than, say, the new Japanese/European supersonic airliner. I can't be sure, but I find it difficult to believe that if I compared the later to, say, a 747-400, that you would consider that to be an unfair comparison.

You later posit that the "post" that started it all was made by a Nantero employee. That may be, although I consider it to be idle speculation. But to suggest that I am also an employee is silly. Did you bother to look at my edit list before making this claim? Was there something in my ~10k edits that suggested this to you? I find it particularily amusing that you added a para on MRAM to "even it out"; amusing because I wrote the majority of the MRAM article as well (and FeRAM, core, acoustic, twistor, bubble, selectron, among others)

The article in its last form was simply a description of an interesting and potentially useful system. That's all. Yout injections of "balance", seemingly randomly deposited through the article, even in the middle of two sentances that are conceptually connected. This really effected readability IMHO. And why exactly did you capitalize Silicon?

So here's what I'm going to do. First I'm going to move the article to "Nano-RAM", and turn the NRAM page into a pointer to NVRAM. On THAT page I'll add a link back in the disambig section. I'm also going to collect up all of your comments into a single section, dividing the article into description, comparison and viability sections.

Maury 13:08, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Physics participation

You received this message because your were on the old list of WikiProject Physics participants.

On 2008-06-25, the WikiProject Physics participant list was rewritten from scratch as a way to remove all inactive participants, and to facilitate the coordination of WikiProject Physics efforts. The list now contains more information, is easier to browse, is visually more appealing, and will be maintained up to date.

If you still are an active participant of WikiProject Physics, please add yourself to the current list of WikiProject Physics participants. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 15:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Matthew l. scullin

A tag has been placed on Matthew l. scullin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nathan Laing (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Official Tourist

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Official Tourist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Malcolma (talk) 15:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Superdunny

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Superdunny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 01:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Apliiq

The article Apliiq has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable secondary source has been supplied to demonstrate that this company is notable. After less than a month, development of this new article appears to have been abandoned.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolphin (t) 12:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]