Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARG Conservation Services
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:15, 30 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Kurykh 21:39, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ARG Conservation Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Completing incomplete nom made by an IP. I abstain. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 20:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this reads a lot like marketing copy. It has no independent reliable sources, and I got under 300 Google hits on the name, with three tangential mentions on Google News Archive. The company doesn't appear to meet corporate guidelines. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 02:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete I work for an engineering firm, and while this is a rather Wikified article, it still reads as engineering firm copy. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.