Talk:Nvu

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Redirect‑class

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Bits of MrJones' text that were removed: for discussion

"The current version certainly lacks some, possibly many, key features of Dreamweaver, such as the ability to simultaneously view source code and a preview. "

Are you sure there are many rather than some?

Yes, but that's just my intuition. I guess whether they are "key" is the crux of it. Mr. Jones 20:04, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Have you done an extensive comparison?

No, I don't have Dreamweaver myself. Could have a look at the product info on the Macromedia website, but I think that'd be the best way to do it.

Could you list the missing key features?

When I next have access to Dreamweaver, yes. :-)

Mr. Jones 13:02, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Daniel's employment

Daniel Glazman runs Disruptive Innovations, SARL, SARL and is an active developer for mozilla.org. The text in the article indicates that he is also employed by mozilla.org which is not the case AFAIK. --Dogmatix 06:28, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

port

NVU was ported to SkyOS (www.skyos.org) so if someone wants to add it in I think it would be good.

Its barely relevant, as its been ported to nearly evey OS under the sun, and as it is, it already said it runs on any platform with the NSPR, which SkyOS has. --Kiand 19:16, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And at that, SkyOS isn't even a "tiered" platform for Mozilla, and hence Nvu, whereas even Tier 2 or Tier 3 platforms aren't even mentioned here. --Kiand 19:22, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NVU no longer maintained

I think it should be mentioned that NVU is going through some changes right now. To put it in a less political correct way, the project appears to stagnate or even be dead. There is a discussion concerning this in the offical NVU developer forum . In any case, the inofficial NVU successor, Kompozer should be mentioned. CNET and others are already offering it as download...

Cheers BlackfoxT 15:34, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He does it in his free time. There are great new features planned, | read his blog, and in fact, the author of kompozer is working on it too: composer progress from glazblog. From this post it seems he doesn't read the nvudev.org forums too closely. 71.81.37.151 15:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second that: isn't KompoZer mentioned in the second section? At the same time as it states Nvu is being "sequelled" & that KompoZer is the temporary replacement until Composer 2.0's finished?... MonstaPro 00:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mozilla Projects & Composer 2.0

Is it true that http://www.mozilla.org/editor/ is not the composer 2.0 homepage? I have checked the Mozilla projects page & the only thing that seems close to it is Editor... MonstaPro 00:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]