Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pankaj Patel (politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 20:35, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pankaj Patel (politician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsuccessful and not notable politician. Looks like he had already been speedied under the name Pankaj Kumar Patel. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 16:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NPOL as only candidate and WP:GNG as no significant coverage of a non-notable individual. Cowlibob (talk) 16:49, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - he ran once and lost. Lots of people including me have done that. Bearian (talk) 20:41, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the nominator, and for the record what is there contains such poor grammar I couldn't possibly rescue it without changing it completely. BritainD (talk) 20:44, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Merely being a candidate doesn't satisfy WP:NPOL.--Skr15081997 (talk) 13:10, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.