User talk:Genisock2
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Base Jumpers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grandslam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Austerity
[edit]United Kingdom Conservative-Liberal coalition government austerity programme: I'll take out the quote boxes, work the material into the text. Pity, since they are informative and one or two provide some historical context to the mistakes Osborne is making. Another editor on the article is caught in a Labour-Tory dichotomy. He doesn't seem to understand that Labour created the mess but that the Tories are not cleaning it up. Who is better? Well, who would ever vote Labour again for creating such a disaster? I dislike them both, that's what he doesn't seem to understand, and I resent the suffering that Osborne is needlessly causing. The source of the bias is Keynesian, not Labour. He doesn't seem to even understand that. If bias shows in the article, and it obviously does, I am guilty; but it's not because I am Labour. Like I said, they are the reason we are in this mess in the first place. Can you give me some grace for two days to go through and tone down the article? I don't mind making the necessary edits. Feel free to check it over after I've done so and give me feedback. I guess the criticism would be easier to take if other people actually made some fucking effort to add stuff to the article rather than simply whine about the stuff that goes against their party-political sympathies. Nothing ever constructive has been done by anyone, look at the contributions. I've made virtually every single edit to it. Every single sentence has at least one citation, sometimes several. I try to include government pronouncements, but they are consistently undermined by the ongoing and predictable reality. It's not my fault if GDP goes negative, is it? ~ Iloveandrea (talk) 22:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Genisock2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Genisock2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
"Vivicam3915" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vivicam3915 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 4#Vivicam3915 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 20:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)