Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optivion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:24, 5 June 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Optivion[edit]
- Optivion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A musician who has only self-released music. No independent and reliable sources. Has been speedily deleted multiple times. Article has refs that didn't back up what was being sourced or didn't mention Optivion. Prod was removed for unknown reasons. Sockpuppets appear to be involved. Bgwhite (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2012
- Delete. After running simple searches on Google, subject fails criteria 1, 3 and 4 of WP:ARTIST. The prominent sources are only social networking sites. It's too soon for this. GuterTag (talk) 09:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, no reliable sources, easily seen to be a deletion candidate. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:35, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No reliable sources. The only mentions of this artist/musician to be found are through social media and personal sites. It could potentially even be speedy deleted, as there is no real claim of notability for this individual. Rorshacma (talk) 16:55, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Only found a press release.[1] No reliable sources - doesn't meet WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 02:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.