Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Smithy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Doczilla (talk | contribs) at 21:32, 22 June 2022 (→‎Jordan Smithy: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Smithy[edit]

Jordan Smithy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

absolutely no reliable sources have covered this individual, aside from a brief 15 minutes of internet spotlight (which isn't covered in RS), there is nothing to be said about them. I tried redirecting to the show they appeared in but the creator has contested, so now I am proposing outright deletion as it also doesn't appear their appearance in Little Mix The Search was significant or likely to result in someone searching for them. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lot of information online regarding 'Jordan Smithy' he is a musician from the UK, and appeared on Little Mix The Search. I am refusing the outright deletion as he does appear = in Little Mix The Search he was a member of Jasper Blue and has worked with Ed Sheeran and Avicii . Please do your research before deleting the Wikpediia article .He also is know as the following; Jordan Anthony Smith,Jordan Anthony Smithy Mixer1111 (talk) 17:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're free to refuse, but it ultimately means nothing. Saying there's lots of information online is not the same as there being reliable sources available, on or offline and as of yet, you've failed to provide a single independent reliable source that covers them in depth. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.