Jump to content

Hannah Ocuish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2001:56a:706e:1100:a556:9fda:2bc3:ea2e (talk) at 18:03, 5 July 2022 (→‎Arrest). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hannah Ocuish
A 1964 depiction of Ocuish's execution
BornMarch 1774
DiedDecember 20, 1786(1786-12-20) (aged 12)
New London, Connecticut, U.S.
Cause of deathExecution by hanging
Resting placeLedyard Center Cemetery
Ledyard, Connecticut, U.S.
(Plot unknown)[3]
Known forYoungest person executed in United States history
Criminal status
  • Executed
    (December 20, 1786; 237 years ago (1786-12-20))
Conviction(s)First-degree murder[1]
Criminal penaltyDeath
Details
VictimsEunice Bolles, aged 6
DateJuly 21, 1786
Date apprehended
July 22, 1786[2]: 28 

Hannah Ocuish (sometimes "Occuish";[4] March 1774 – December 20, 1786) was a 12-year old Pequot Native American girl with an intellectual disability who was hanged on December 20, 1786, in New London, Connecticut. She is believed to be the youngest person executed in the United States.[5] She was accused of murdering Eunice Bolles, the 6-year old daughter of a wealthy farmer. In recent years, Ocuish's actual culpability and the fairness of her trial have come into question.[3]

Biography

Early life

Henry Channing, a minister, published a sermon entitled God Admonishing His People of their Duty ... a Sermon ... Occasioned by the Execution of Hannah Ocuish, a Mixed Girl, Aged 12 Years and 9 Months, for the Murder of Eunice Bolles, Aged 6 Years and 6 Months.[2] It describes the negative light in which her early life was presented to the court:

AS the Public may wish to be informed more particularly respecting the criminal, Hannah Ocuish, than they have yet been: we have collected the following particulars, which it may not be improper to annex as an appendix to the preceding discourse.

She was born at Groton.—Early in life she discovered the maliciousness and cruelty of her disposition: as appears from the following fact, which was represented in evidence before the grand-jury. When about six years old, she with a brother about two years older than herself, meeting a little girl at a distance from the neighbourhood, they endeavoured to get away her clothes and a gold necklace which she had on.—After beating the child until they had almost killed her, they stripped her, and disputing about the division of the clothes the child recovered, and getting away came home, covered with blood. This affair was immediately examined into, and the select-men of the town concluded to bind them both out.

Their mother, who is one of the Pequot tribe of indians, is an abandoned creature, much addicted to the vice of drunkenness.—She, it seems, not liking to have the girl bound out; brought her away and left her at a house, about three miles from the city of New-London, promising to return in a few days and take her away again. But she did not return 'till after several months, when urging the family to keep her longer they at length consented.—She continued in this family until she was apprehended for the crime, for which she was executed.

Her conduct, as appeared in evidence before the honorable Superior Court was marked with almost every thing bad. Theft and lying were her common vices. To these were added a maliciousness of disposition which made the children in the neighbourhood much afraid of her. She had a degree of artful cunning and sagacity beyond many of her years. —In short, her mind wanted to be properly instructed, and her disposition to be corrected.

Murder

Murder of Eunice Bolles
LocationPublic road leading from New-London to Norwich[2]: 29–30 
DateJuly 21, 1786; 238 years ago (1786-07-21)
Around 10 AM[2]: 29 
Attack type
Child murder by bludgeoning and strangling
WeaponA rock[6]
VictimEunice Bolles, aged 6
MotiveAccusation of theft
ConvictedHannah Ocuish
VerdictGuilty
ConvictionsFirst-degree murder
SentenceDeath

The only inculpatory evidence against her was her confession to the investigators. The confession was never corroborated by anyone besides the investigators. Ocuish had reportedly said before her confession that she had seen four boys near the scene.

Her confession includes baiting the victim with calico, beating her nearly to death with a rock, strangling her to death, and placing rocks to stage an accident.[2]: 30 

Karen Halttunen, a history professor at the University of California at Davis, summarized the crime:[7][8]

On the 21st of July, 1786, at about 10 o'clock in the morning, the body of the murdered child was found in the public road leading from New-London to Norwich, lying on its face near to a wall ... The neighborhood turned out to hunt for the murderer; Hannah was questioned and claimed that she had seen four boys near the scene of the crime. When a search failed to turn them up, Hannah was interrogated again, and then taken to the Bolles home to be charged with homicide in the presence of the dead child. She burst into tears and confessed. Only at this late point in the narrative is the reader offered a sequential account of the crime. Five weeks earlier, Eunice had reported Hannah for stealing fruit during the strawberry harvest, and Hannah had plotted revenge. Catching sight of her young enemy headed for school one morning, Hannah had lured Eunice from her path with a gift of calico, then beat and choked her to death.

Arrest

Ocuish was accused of killing six-year-old Eunice Bolles, the daughter of a wealthy farmer, after quarreling with her over the theft of strawberries. The murder was reported in the July 27, 1786, issue of the Norwich Packet.[9] One day after the murder, on July 22, 1786, she confessed to and was charged with the murder and held in pre-trial prison.[2]: 30 

Trial

During Ocuish's trial, she pleaded not guilty at the direction of defense counsel[2]: 30  and seemed unfazed and calm as the rest of those present, including the presiding judge, were brought to tears multiple times.[10] The court found her guilty.

Sentencing

Although Ocuish's youth was considered, it could not be a mitigating factor, so the judge decided: "The sparing of you on account of your age would, as the law says, be of dangerous consequence to the public, by holding up an idea, that children might commit such atrocious crimes with impunity." He sentenced Ocuish to hang.[6] Under the state of law at that time, age and disability were not mitigating factors: "the age of a criminal was considered inconsequential; swift and relentless punishment was viewed as the only practicable method of keeping the lawless element in check."[6] Additionally, under the Murder Act 1752, a conviction of murder required a mandatory death penalty by hanging within 48 hours.[11]

Execution

As she awaited execution, Hannah's anxiety grew worse, and she spent most of the day of her hanging in tears. At her execution, she thanked the sheriff for his kindness as she stepped forward to be hanged.[2]: 29  Spectators to the execution said that Ocuish "appeared greatly afraid, and seemed to want somebody to help her."[12]

Reexamination

In March 2020, leaders of the New London chapter of the NAACP assembled a group including historians, tribal members, attorneys, and the Connecticut chapter of the Innocence Project to re-examine Ocuish's case to attempt to determine Ocuish's guilt and whether or not she received a fair trial. While the NAACP-assembled group has cautioned that they may not be able to reach a conclusion, if evidence favors Ocuish's innocence or her receiving an unfair trial, it will be decided whether or not to recommend an exoneration to the Connecticut General Assembly. It has been suggested by the group and by others that her race, age, disability, and gender may have played a role in her conviction and sentence.[13][14] The group will also attempt to contact remaining descendants of Ocuish and Eunice Bolles.[3]

See also

Sources

  • Channing, Henry (1786). God admonishing his people of their duty, as parents and masters: a sermon, preached at New-London, December 20th, 1786, occasioned by the execution of Hannah Ocuish, a mulatto girl, aged 12 years and 9 months, for the murder of Eunice Bolles, aged 6 years and 6 months. T. Green. LCCN 03005574. OCLC 18140982.

References

  1. ^ jstagis@courant.com, By JULIE STAGIS. "A Girl, 12, Is Hanged In Connecticut For Murder In 1786". courant.com. Retrieved February 25, 2022.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Channing (1786) [1]
  3. ^ a b c Florin, Karen (March 7, 2020). "Centuries-old murder case to be revisited in New London". The Day. Retrieved July 5, 2022.
  4. ^ Caulkins, Frances Manwaring (1895). History of New London, Connecticut: From the First Survey of the Coast in 1612 to 1860. New London: H. D. Utley. pp. 576–577. OCLC 654229578.
  5. ^ "Regional Studies, The Northeast". Archived from the original on February 4, 2009. Retrieved May 30, 2009.
  6. ^ a b c jstagis@courant.com, By JULIE STAGIS. "A Girl, 12, Is Hanged In Connecticut For Murder In 1786". courant.com. Retrieved February 25, 2022.
  7. ^ "Divine Providence and Dr. Parkman's Jawbone". Archived from the original on July 22, 2012. Retrieved December 9, 2012.
  8. ^ A Most Unusual Criminal Execution in New London
  9. ^ Cameron, Kenneth Walter (1983). Seabury Traditions: The Reconstructed Journal of Connecticut's First Diocesan. Vol. 1. Transcendental Books. p. 34. OCLC 731030865.
  10. ^ "Hannah Ocuish and Eunice Bolles".
  11. ^ https://www.politics.co.uk/reference/capital-punishment/
  12. ^ "1786: A FIGHT OVER STRAWBERRIES; A GIRL IS HANGED".
  13. ^ "Sentenced to death, but innocent: These are stories of justice gone wrong". History. February 18, 2021. Retrieved July 5, 2022.
  14. ^ Yung, Alexander (September 6, 2020). "The 12-Year-Old Mixed-Race Girl Hanged For Murder". Medium. Retrieved July 5, 2022.

Further reading

  • Streib, Victor L. (1987). Death penalty for juveniles. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-31615-4.