Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group of Belarusian military specialists in Venezuela

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Group of Belarusian military specialists in Venezuela

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article reads like it is telling a story per WP:OR. Most of the content is unsourced.

It is very common of countries to provide assistance to each other when it comes to developing military technologies. I don't see why this trivial subject even needs own article per WP:NOPAGE. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 12:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Belarus, and Venezuela. Shellwood (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Rename to Belarus–Venezuela relations. The sources cited in the article appear reliable within the limited scope of what Belarusian policy actually is towards Venezuela. Relations between the two countries, of which military co-operation is a subset, appears to be a WP:GNG pass per at least the following references: 1 2 3 4 5 6. FOARP (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, cleanup and rename to Belarus-Venezuela relations. While some of the info seems WP:OR, it can be still retained after rescoping. ~~

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:38, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.