Talk:ISSEA
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 14 March 2021 by Modulato. |
![]() | Higher education Unassessed | ||||||
|
List of accredited Swiss universities according with the old law LAU deleted at january 1st 2015
Since this school is not on the list, it is unaccredited. Being (or having been) a member of the assembly of a Slovene university (EMUNI) is irrelevant: this Swiss school is not accredited in Switzerland.--Bianbum (talk) 17:06, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. See also List of universities in Switzerland and http://www4.ti.ch/?id=73786 --Adrin10 (talk) 13:32, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
The list of a CRUS is not a official list of the recognized universities in Switzerland and has not legal value — Preceding unsigned comment added by Equalizerbis (talk • contribs) 13:54, 4 March 2015 (UTC) The accreditation is not a legal requirement in Switzerland.It'is a voluntary certificate of quality only. The new federal law LPSU established a term of 8 years to obtain the accreditation The Politecnico is recognized by law and actually is not yet accredited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Equalizerbis (talk • contribs) 13:56, 4 March 2015 (UTC) the article is a heap of inaccuracies written by someone who does not know the Swiss law and that for fear of the truth prevents the page is correct with the necessary clarifications — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxsilverbis (talk • contribs) 16:12, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Restoring page
The Politecnico is a private recognized university operating outside the Cantone Ticino ( at Roveredo Cantone Graubunden) and so is not subject to the law of the Canton Ticino. This is why it is not in the list of Cantone Ticino. The list of the CRUS is not a official list of the recognized universities and is not to legally binding
In Switzerland the accreditation is a voluntary certificate of quality to using the name " university". According to the federal Law LPSU since the January 1st 2015 the term to obtain the accreditation is the year 2023, up at that date the use of the term university is free outside the Cantone Ticino. I inform that the law of the Canton Ticino was challenged for unconstitutionality before the Federal Court The accreditation is not a legal requirement to operate and confer university degree in Switzerland and to ask fo the recognition of the issued qualification in Europe ( Lisbon Convention 1997) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxsilverbis (talk • contribs) 16:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Your "university" is not accredited. True, accreditation is not mandatory in some Cantons. Why are you so upset, then? --Adrin10 (talk) 19:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Because you write incorrect information. The university is not YET accredited.The new federal law established a term to ask the accreditaion from 8 years. Until then in the Canton Graubunden the term university is free The accreditation is not a legal recognition but a certificate of quality only46.14.86.55 (talk) 13:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- The school has already been denied accreditation. In theory you could apply again, but "not yet accredited" means… unaccredited. Plain and simple.--79.36.239.75 (talk) 10:06, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
No it's not so simply as you think.Since the 1st january 2015 the New federal law LPSU established the term to ask the accreditation start up from 8 year so all the public and private universities must be reaccredited within 8 years.Until this date the term University is free all over the switzerland except in the Cantone Ticino.The accreditation is a voluntary certification and it'is not e recognition by the State or by the Canton.It's false that the Politecnico has been denied the accreditation because never has been asked.You know that the info edited are incomplete and not correct.I invite you to edit the correct ones'Equalizerquater (talk) 07:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Tour reference no.14 it's a example of false information and it is a illegal defamation.I advice you the this way to give info will be prosecuted by law Equalizerquater (talk) 07:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
I inform you that Anna Cuomo the writer of the reference no.14 edited on your pages will be prosecuted in Italy for a defamation, the his accusations of theft involving the vice president of the European parliament over the avv.Massimo Silvestri with false accusations and obscene. For this will be presented before the Italian justice a formal complaint against her and also against those who spread these falsehoods imounemente.Equalizerter (talk) 08:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- The source that you don't like belongs to Sapienza University of Rome. Good luck--Adrin10 (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
the threat of legal action is founded in the reference cited accused the vice president of the European Parliament to have in competition with lawyer Massimo Silvestri stolen public money from European funds. This is a serious accusation that can not 'be widespread impunity from wikipediaUnipsa (talk) 11:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
the lawyers of the Polytechnic of business studies pursue justice all those who spread the news that the Polytechnic sells pieces of paper .This info is clearly defamatory and all those who contribute to spread it on the network will be immediately sued. Immediately deleted the offending post it or suffer the consequences of personal number wherever you are.Will be started criminal proceedings against you in front of the justice of your countryUnipsa2 (talk) 11:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
I will inform the European authorities on the serious accusations against the deputy speaker of parliament and will present a formal complaint against the authors of the articles Unipsa2 (talk) 12:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Both socks indefinitely blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Silly fellows. Socks belong on your feet—and occasionally in a drawer—not on talk pages. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 20 Adar 5775 13:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
quale blocco siete dei disgraziati e irresponsabili Unipsa4 (talk) 15:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- E qua, devi parlare SOLAMENTE in inglese. Anche, controlla bene WP:NPA Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 20 Adar 5775 17:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, why do you keep insulting and creating alts?--Adrin10 (talk) 19:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Revision of may 23th, there many fake news in this page concerning the legal status, the value of the accreditation in Switzerland, the connection with other institutions as Cismad Unisareffaele univolta that are not connected with Politecnico. The judgements indicated are not Definitive judgments and the Politecnico appealed to the Federal Court. The decision of the Authorities of the Cantone Ticino apply only in the canton of Ticino. In the canton zug the university name is absolutely lawful and And activity continues on a regular basis. This year the Politecnico celebrates 30 years of activity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.63.249.198 (talk) 10:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Prove it. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 13:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
INFORMAZIONI FALSE E NON CORRISPONDENTI AL VERO
La motivazione di avere cancellato solo una parte del testo dove viene nominata la Unisanraffaele come facente parte del Politecnico è ASSOLUTAMENTE FALSA E PRIVA DI OGNI FONDAMENTO, QUESTA E' LA MOTIVAZIONE, NEL CASO IN QUI DOVRESTE INSISTERE CON QUESTE FALSITA' SAREMO COSTRETTI AD AGIRE DIVERSAMENTE RIVOLGENDOCI ALLE SEDI OPPORTUNE. CORDIALI SALUTI. ( Evangelic (talk) 07:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)).
- @Evangelic: This is English Wikipedia, we communicate here in English. From Google Translate, I gather you think the information you removed is false. What makes you so sure? — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 07:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- I saw the removed info and accepted it, only because it was unsourced. There was more unsourced info in that paragraph, so I removed that too. Hope this helps. --‖ Ebyabe talk - General Health ‖ 07:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Ebyabe: Please don't be taken in by this WP:SPA. This appears to be just another in a series of attempts by SPAs to whitewash the well-deserved negative reputation of Politecnico di Studi Aziendali. These attempts have been happening for years. The websites mentioned in the removed texts back up the statements. Potential students and their future employers need to know what that organization is doing. I urge you to reconsider. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 07:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I reverted back. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 07:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Ebyabe: Thank you. I copied this section from my user talk page for greater transparency. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 13:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I reverted back. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 07:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Ebyabe: Please don't be taken in by this WP:SPA. This appears to be just another in a series of attempts by SPAs to whitewash the well-deserved negative reputation of Politecnico di Studi Aziendali. These attempts have been happening for years. The websites mentioned in the removed texts back up the statements. Potential students and their future employers need to know what that organization is doing. I urge you to reconsider. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 07:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- I saw the removed info and accepted it, only because it was unsourced. There was more unsourced info in that paragraph, so I removed that too. Hope this helps. --‖ Ebyabe talk - General Health ‖ 07:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Richiesta modifica
Vi chiediamo di togliere "Atena Unitelematica scuola universitaria www.uniatena.ch" (Telematic university Athena)
Atena non ha alcun rapporto con le altre organizzazioni citate potete vedere il registro di commercio svizzero al link https://www.zefix.admin.ch/it/search/entity/list/firm/1270211
Grazie per l'attenzione Saluti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiocciola63 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Supdi inconsistent information
Good morning as a student of Supdi I would like to point out the contradiction between the definition of "diploma mill" and the phrase "claims to operate on the basis of the economic freedom and scientific freedom guaranteed in Title 2 of the Swiss Federal Constitution (art. 27 and art. 20)" A diploma mill (also known as a degree mill) is a company or organization that claims to be a higher education institution but provides illegitimate academic degrees and diplomas for a fee.[1][2] The degrees can be fabricated (made-up), falsified (fake), or misrepresented (practically useless). in this case (Supdi) the diplomas are awarded in accordance with the Swiss Federal Constitution and therefore are perfectly legal and therefore Issea cannot be defined as a diploma mill. In Switzerland the accreditation is not compulsory and it is not necessary to legally confer university degrees. The judgment of the Federal Administrative Court of St. Gallen is incorrectly cited, in fact in paragraph 2.1. the court confirms that Issea is recognized by Swiss national law as a private university and can award university degrees without any accreditation.
As regards the title of lawyer ( avv.) of Mr. Silvestri Massimo, it is perfectly legitimate as he has been enrolled in the Milan Bar for over 10 years, and according to the Italian professional law, all those who have been enrolled in the register retain the title unless they have been radiators. This is not the case given that Mr. Silvestri voluntarily asked for cancellation due to transfer of residence. I therefore ask you to specify this information and correct the information given. It does not correspond to the truth that the staff speaks only Italian as they are multilingual (the three Swiss national languages, Italian, German, French) in addition to English , Spanish and Russian. It is not true that there are no professors and lectures. There is a physical location with its own offices, a dozen contract professors and a platform (Moodle) of educational content. The news of a conviction for misleading advertising is false, in fact the Lazio administrative court canceled it, confirming that the website does not spread misleading messages. There is no relationship with the Accademia Eraclitea di Catania. The San Marino branch is legally authorized with a government license to carry out continuous training activities for which no accreditation. All this information is based on official documentation in my possession which I can produce at your request at any time As a Supdi student I feel I can support Supdi's credibility and reliability and I am sorry that the university where I studied is so little considered. The fact of not being accredited in itself does not mean that the offer is not of good quality and serious anyway. I therefore invite you to review without prejudice the published info and if necessary, after proper verification of the documents in my possession, make the changes considered useful for a better description more adherent to the relation of things. Thank you for your attention Elvira Bethania Tejada Guzman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elvirabet (talk • contribs) 09:58, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Informazioni incoerenti ed inesatte
Buongiorno come studente di Supdi vorrei sottolineare la contraddizione tra la definizione di "mulino diplomi" e la frase "afferma di operare sulla base della libertà economica e della libertà scientifica garantite dal Titolo 2 della Costituzione federale svizzera ( art. 27 e art. 20)" Un mulino dei diplomi (noto anche come mulino dei diplomi) è una società o un'organizzazione che afferma di essere un istituto di istruzione superiore ma fornisce titoli accademici e diplomi illegittimi a pagamento.[1][2] I diplomi possono essere fabbricati (inventati), falsificati (falsi) o travisati (praticamente inutili). in questo caso (Supdi) i diplomi sono rilasciati secondo la Costituzione federale svizzera e quindi sono perfettamente legali e quindi Isea non può essere definita una fabbrica di diplomi. In Svizzera l'accreditamento non è obbligatorio e non è necessario conferire legalmente titoli di studio universitari. La sentenza del Tribunale amministrativo federale di San Gallo è erroneamente citata, infatti al paragrafo 2.1. il tribunale conferma che Isea è riconosciuta dal diritto nazionale svizzero come università privata e può rilasciare diplomi universitari senza alcun accreditamento.
Per quanto riguarda il titolo di avvocato (avv.) del Sig. Silvestri Massimo, è perfettamente legittimo in quanto è iscritto all'Ordine degli Avvocati di Milano da oltre 10 anni, e secondo il diritto professionale italiano, tutti coloro che sono stati iscritti all'albo registro conserva il titolo a meno che non siano stati termosifoni. Questo non è il caso in quanto il Sig. Silvestri ha chiesto volontariamente la cancellazione per trasferimento di residenza. Vi chiedo pertanto di specificare questa informazione e di correggere le informazioni fornite. Non corrisponde al vero che il personale parla solo italiano in quanto è multilingue (le tre lingue nazionali svizzere, italiano, tedesco, francese) oltre a inglese, spagnolo e russo. Non è vero che non ci sono professori e lezioni. C'è una sede fisica con i propri uffici, una dozzina di professori a contratto e una piattaforma (Moodle) di contenuti educativi. La notizia di una condanna per pubblicità ingannevole è falsa, infatti il tribunale amministrativo del Lazio l'ha annullata, confermando che il sito non diffonde messaggi ingannevoli. Non esiste alcun rapporto con l'Accademia Eraclitea di Catania. La sede sammarinese è legalmente autorizzata con licenza governativa a svolgere attività di formazione continua per la quale non è accreditato. Tutte queste informazioni si basano sulla documentazione ufficiale in mio possesso che posso produrre su vostra richiesta in qualsiasi momento Come studente Supdi mi sento di sostenere la credibilità e affidabilità di Supdi e mi dispiace che l'università dove ho studiato sia così poco considerata. Il fatto di non essere di per sé accreditato non significa che l'offerta non sia comunque di buona qualità e seria. Vi invito pertanto a prendere visione senza pregiudizio delle info pubblicate ed eventualmente, dopo opportuna verifica dei documenti in mio possesso, ad apportare le modifiche ritenute utili per una migliore descrizione più aderente al rapporto delle cose. Grazie per l'attenzione Elvira Bethania Tejada Guzman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elvirabet (talk • contribs) 15:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
New "university"
Yet another "university" from this individual: https://www.isucampus.ch It's a simple website created a few months ago. --Dom21a (talk) 11:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)