Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boho Interactive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Doczilla (talk | contribs) at 01:26, 28 August 2022 (→‎Boho Interactive: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 01:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Boho Interactive[edit]

Boho Interactive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails GNG. I only found a few minor mentions and two news stories on an event they organised. not enough to meet the notability criteria. TryKid[dubiousdiscuss] 18:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Its website says that it is " a collective of Australian artists and game designers", but no notable people are involved. Only one inaccessible article is cited (what does it say?). The website continues: "We create interactive performances and games". Unless we see WP:Reliable sources writing about them, they do not satisfy the notability criteria. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:28, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I've added references, including a profile of the company in New Scientist (2016) and updated the list of projects and collaborating partners. Not sure, but maybe this addresses the notability concerns? Ebb3030 (talk) 14:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You only added one source, and in that article, Boho is just one of the companies mentioned. I'm still a *Delete*. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fair. I've added additional references and citations, including to HuffPostUK, the Sydney Morning Herald, UCL Culture blogs and an abstract for a research paper about the company presented at the European Geophysicists Union. See what you think. Ebb3030 (talk) 22:22, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.