User talk:Thisaccountis42

test

Milton Rubincam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Milton Rubincam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kj cheetham (talk) 22:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Milton Rubincam has been accepted

Milton Rubincam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 05:25, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Universalisation (cultural studies)

Thank you for creating Universalisation (cultural studies). In order for the article to be passed as reviewed, please consider returning to it and addressing the tagged issues. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Universalisation (cultural studies) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Universalisation (cultural studies) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universalisation (cultural studies) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A loose necktie (talk) 02:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Universalization (social work)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Universalization (social work) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://whoatwherewhy.com/what-is-meant-by-universalization/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A loose necktie (talk) 02:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made this article from Universalization, which I just nominated for speedy deletion as well. Thisaccountis42 (talk) 03:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Universalisation (cultural studies)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Universalisation (cultural studies) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.artsnova.com/blog/2018/06/25/1239/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A loose necktie (talk) 02:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Universalization

I have undone your edits to Universalization as follows:

Removed the db-copyvio template because the copyvio text has been removed.
Removed the AFD template because it is malformed, no AFD discussion.

If you want to nominate it for AFD, please try again. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out

There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!

On July 12, an update regarding the latest team and development news has been published.

On July 15, an essay regarding the potential of Abstract Wikipedia, written by Denny, has been published.

Subscribe · Translate this message

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out

There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!

On July 20, an update regarding the latest additions to the team has been published.

On July 29, an essay regarding long typed lists and how to deal with them, written by Denny, has been published.

On August 5, an essay regarding a proposed launch plan for Wikifunctions, written by Denny, has been published.

Enjoy the reading!

Subscribe · Translate this message

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out

There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!

On August 9, an update regarding the launch of Wikifunctions Beta has been published.

On August 19, an update regarding the proposed template language syntax for Wikifunctions and the Wikimania 2022 sessions dedicated to Wikifunctions and Ninai-Udiron has been published.

Enjoy the reading!

Subscribe · Translate this message

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]