Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duality Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duality Technologies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:NCORP. I tried paring down the article to neutral content but I don't think there's much left. [1], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [10] are not "completely independent" of the subject. [2], [8], [9] are primary sources. [11] is written by a cofounder. [13] seems to be more about the open source software than this company. [12] is paywalled so I can't assess it.

Through Google News I found [1], which has a questionable tone; same with [2]. There's some stuff on "Duality Accelerator", which is unrelated. Couldn't find much else besides press releases. Ovinus (talk) 00:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Computing. Ovinus (talk) 00:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, sources are scant. What's given here isn't much use, I can't find anything close to RS in a GSearch. Oaktree b (talk) 02:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glassdoor reviews, a company blog, linkedin. Long way from GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 02:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:46, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.