This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.
Seems to be little more than a conspiracy theory (in the most pejorative sense of that term) to me. What I'm reading here is "there are cyber attacks on xyz targets and they all follow the same pattern - first they look for vulnerabilities, then they use those vulnerabilities to get inside the system, then they dig around and figure out how to use those vulnerabilities, finally they unleash their attack". And that similarity in style obviously indicates that these are all coming from the same source.
Which would be fine - except that any other model of getting into a system has already been tried and is now easily detected. Any serious attack on a system now MUST follow the "rules" or it'll get detected. (Well, at least until somebody figures out a way to circumvent the rules in a new and interesting way). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.235.131 (talk) 00:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
