Talk:Exmor

Brands Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photography Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sony IMX240 Exmor Sensor is RS, not R

Hi; I don't have time to edit this page right now, but the IMX240 is in the wrong table - it is an RS, not an R sensor. --$tephen T. Crye (talk) 20:42, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I found time to learn the table syntax and fixed it. --$tephen T. Crye (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sony Z1/Z2 Exmor RS Sensor

Does anyone know which sensor is used by the Sony Z1/Z2? I know it is supposedly the same sensor in both of them, and I have most of the relevant information, however I can't really add it (or provide a proper source for it) without the model number. I've been searching for the number for a little bit, but I can't find anything. Charwinger21 (talk) 00:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source for adding info

Hey guys, Sony has the specs for most models in both this article and the HAD CCD article readily available here. http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news/new_pro.html Each individual page says what category the sensor fits into, and the link in the bottom right corner to the PDF has the (mostly) full specs. Unfortunately there are some ~70 issues left to go (with ~3 items each) and I am out of time. I'll try to finish off the table in the future, but it will be a long time before I am able to work through the entire thing. Also, we may need to break Exmor R and Exmor RS out into separate articles (or break all of the sensors out into their own article like we see with List of AMD graphics processing units. Not sure what the best way to proceed is for that, but any input is welcome. Charwinger21 (talk) 07:55, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One M9 normal edition

http://www.toshiba.com/taec/adinfo/cmos/pdf/14I01_T4KA7_ProdBrief.pdf

Captcha: bierankle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.232.197.220 (talk) 18:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Exmor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100419131019/http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/technology/technology/theme/exmor_r_01.html to http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/technology/technology/theme/exmor_r_01.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to lhttp://www.nubiamobileshop.com/nubia-z9-4g-lte-3gb-32gb-black.html
Added archive https://archive.is/20140726210015/http://ww2.ptgrey.com/exmorgs to http://ww2.ptgrey.com/exmorgs

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lemma name - chaning to "Sony Exmor"

Since the Manufacturer is Sony, i suggest to change the lemma's name to "Sony Exmor".
And to switch the redirection pages ("Sony Exmor" redirection would become the new article page and "Exmor" the new redirection page). --Angerdan (talk) 16:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a different Exmor that we need to disambiguate this one from? It seems this Exmor is the main Exmor. 198.52.130.137 (talk) 11:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Product catalog.

Once more I removed an excessive list of product variants from the article. I am not opposed to giving an overview, but 151k is way too much and swamps the article in, basically, fancruft. Kleuske (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the "excessive" list of product is pretty relevant to the article. some people may find it useful. if you deemed it to be useless or "swamps the article" then just ignore. Bluglasses (talk) 09:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that section headers all start with “list of” should give you a hint they don’t actually belong in an article. A LIst like that lends WP:UNDUE weight to obscure models, instead of giving an overview over developments and variants and their use.

A list of popular models and camera’s they’re used in? Fine. The specs of some obscure monochrome sensor, nobody has ever heard of? Not so much. This data dump defeats the purpose of the article. Kleuske (talk) 17:48, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then only such obscure cases should be removed, not the entirety of the list. Also it's vital to have a list of new sensors which are not yet in any cameras, as they come into production few years ahead of appearing in consumer products. This data it's not available anywhere else in a concise manner, only as per-sensor specsheets all around sony's website. Some old/irrelevant rows can be deleted. 181.167.210.101 (talk) 22:04, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]