Jump to content

User talk:Nigel Cross

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) at 00:27, 29 November 2022 (ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 12:29, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

design books

[edit]

maybe you are right and my choice of books was rather arbitrary and even pointless. on the other hand - there are basic works in design practice and theory that should be mentioned. so while gedenryd's dissertation was an eye-opener for me and thus placing it on the website is highly subjective, christopher alexander might be worth mentioning somewhere. of course it might also be the case that one of your books should be listed :-)

for now, i've remove the book list.

what about starting a page on "design theory" and putting the books there? of course, you would be one of the persons able to write such an entry while i'm rather not. Martinpi 09:08, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Books and articles on design methods?

[edit]

I thought you might be able to offer some much needed expertise to a discussion we're having concerning the Design methods article. I'm still trying to understand what the author (the one editor has written almost the entire article) means by design methods, but he repeatedly asserts that Jones' "Design Methods" is the only book ever written about design methods. I've provided a link to a workshop I participated in some years back [1] which includes a good reference list, including your own "Engineering Design Methods". Care to offer some perspective and a bit of your expertise by recommending good books and articles on design methods, or alternatively if I'm mistaken, backing that Jones' is the only one? --Ronz 18:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Books

[edit]

Of course Jones is not the only one! I studied with JC Jones and have great respect for him, but his book was written in the late 1960s and has never been revised except for his adding comments as prefaces. He regarded his book as his 'farewell present' to the design methods movement, but it may still have relevance for many people.

Apart from the excellent 'Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for product design' (3rd edition, Wiley, 2001) by the Cross fellow, recent others include:

K. Krippendorf 'The Semantic Turn: A new foundation for design' (CRC Press, 2006) (includes some methods, in a wider context)

C. Nemeth 'Human Factors Methods for Design: Making systems human-centered' (CRC Press, 2004) (excellent)

K. Ulrich & S. Eppinger 'Product Design and Development' (3rd edn., McGraw Hill, 2003) (really good)

These are mostly aimed at product design, and I realise that there are other set of interests and methods centred on systems design, interaction design, etc. but unfortunately I'm not familiar with those.

I remember being alerted to the original design methods entry in wikipedia, but I thought that it had so much wrong with it that I couldn't start to revise it! I feel similar despair about the wikipedia 'design' entry! I see that there is now a huge history of discussion on the design methods article, that I wasn't aware of (It's not on my watchlist). Good luck!

Nigel Cross 18:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the recommendations! --Ronz 18:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Industrial design and Design Portal

[edit]

I recently posted the following text on Wikipedia regarding the creation of a new Visual arts/Technology-related project in Wikipedia:

WikiProject Industrial design is a Wikipedian community that aims to better organize information in articles related to Industrial design (also called Product design).

  • If I'm cor-rec-to, there are about 1850 articles on Industrial design in Wikipedia...
  • At least, it's more than for Typography, and there IS a Typography WikiProject...
  • And it's more than the Fashion WikiProject with 482 articles...
  • There is also an Urban studies and planning project and a Video games portal so...
  • Now you can also see a proposal for the Design Portal. (that portal would be for Industrial design AND Graphic design/Interior design)

Please support this initiative,
--  Alain  R 3 4 5 
Techno-Wiki-Geek
19:55, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Nigel Cross. You have new messages at Jab843's talk page.
Message added 00:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jab843 (talk) 00:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Nigel Cross. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Nigel Cross. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Design methods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AEI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:William Balchin

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Nigel Cross. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William Balchin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:William Balchin

[edit]

Hello, Nigel Cross. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "William Balchin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]