Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YTMND

YTMND

Is this web-vanity or a subject worthy of note? Is an Alexa traffic rank of 91,947 sufficient for inclusion? Why or why not? --GRider\^talk 19:25, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete due to Wikipedia not being a web guide, this website not being particularly notable, and the article being almost entirely trivia that nobody but the people involved could possibly care about. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:15, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Personally I feel that as it stands, the article contains too much irrelevant information. As I was thinking of how I would precis it, I realized that the remaining information would be pretty thin. Given that and how I don't see how spawning a few equally obscure offshoots makes it notable, I vote get rid of it. Katefan0 21:40, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, ad, sounds like Max is tryin' to create a buzz. Wonder if he paid for that SC pic. Wyss 01:03, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, forum advertisment. Megan1967 02:58, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn forumcruft. ComCat 02:29, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• No Delete. YOU'RE THE DOGS NOW, MAN.
• Above by 64.237.129.160. Katefan0 16:19, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I don't see anything wrong with having a page on YTMND. If there's something wrong with it, fix it. --ɛvɪs 07:10, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advertising/self-promotion for a non-notable forum--nixie 07:14, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. Anyone who did not know what the letters stood for should still be able to find an explanation when encountering references in Internet discussions. I propose that the Internet phenomenon page have a section explaining items not worthy of their own entry.