Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian transport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian transport

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Due to some recent contriversies I had decided to delete this wikiproject all contributors have withdrawn from the project as well. The project pages are very much imcomplete. I had tried request speed deletion under db author however another editor has made significant contributions so I started an mfd Note the following articles also need deletion as they are subpages if there are more please mention them here

NotOrrio (talk) 13:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not transcluded to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it's very unclear what is being requested here and why, but I see no reason to start deleting things unless ThylacineHunter (the aforementioned "another editor") agrees to the deletion. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Struck, after some thinking about it, the argument for deletion does make sense. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If the project is inactive, then mark it as such, but wholesale deletion of a WikiProject is rarely appropriate. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Changing my opinion to neutral per Redrose64. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (and reply to Thebiguglyalien) Whilst it is rarely appropriate to delete a WikiProject that has been active in the past, this one hasn't got off the ground yet. The pages listed above seem to have been created prematurely. Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Closing proposals says Proposals are generally closed as successful if several active editors (aim for 6 to 12) are interested in starting and participating in the project. and Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Australian Transport has two supporters (NotOrrio and ThylacineHunter) plus a cautionary post from JarrahTree. I cannot find a proposal at WP:COUNCIL for WikiProject Victorian Transport (which is an ambiguous name, it might refer to transport in the period 1837-1900). --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no evidence that this project ever properly got off the ground, so there's nothing to archive. Furthermore, such a narrow project launched without an existing community to buy-in is a bad idea and is very unlikely to ever be resurrected. (If there's truly a desire to preserve something, it can be userfy'd as a distant second choice, but really, there's nothing here to save, it's all auto-generated stuff.) SnowFire (talk) 20:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and SnowFire. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 23:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as stillborn, now somebody please just close this. Dronebogus (talk) 21:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.