User talk:SRBirch922

Welcome!

Hello, SRBirch922, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Katr67 01:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Perpetual virginity of Mary, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The Bible is not WP:RS, see WP:RSPSCRIPTURE. Your own analysis of the Bible is banned as original research. tgeorgescu (talk) 05:16, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is a perfectly understandable rule; but I thought that, in this case: since this reading is so obvious and undeniable, and since it is a position that nobody questions (that is, those who do not believe Mary was a virgin at Jesus' birth, do not contest the meaning of this verse, do not use this verse to make their case; they believe that she was not a virgin at His conception). Regardless, I provided a reference, other than Scripture; specifically, https://www.gotquestions.org/virgin-Mary.html , showing that this is the position of those who believe in the virgin birth, but not in perpetual virginity. Then there is the fact that these refer to "the virgin birth", rather than "the virgin conception. I hope that you now find this to be sufficiently sourced.

SRBirch922 (talk) 20:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]