Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Gabler

Mike Gabler

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect attempts contested multiple times. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:57, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:57, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or restore redirect as per nom.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:15, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I created this page for Mike Gabler and it seems that there's been quite a bit of back and forth between it being deleted or staying. When I created the article, I didn't really know how to properly cite it, so if there's anything that can be done to add to it and make it more acceptable, please let me know. Every other winner of Survivor has their own Wikipedia page, so I believe this should be no different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coltyn1234 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS should not apply here. Just because other winners of the series have articles does not automatically assume the necessity for an article on this person. It still needs to meet notability guidelines. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm object. The original editor has give more then enough for notability guidelines. I have read the notability guidelines the one that the People Magazine published is more then enough. and He had given 16 different sources, how is that not enough? Maryanne Oketch page only has 5 articles and no one questioned it yet Thomas Sussek (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is more then enough Credible sources to keep the page to exist Thomas Sussek (talk) 15:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]