User talk:Tictictoc

As an admin, I am now closing the ANI thread. Your apology above gives me hope that you will take the above requests by J. M. and Alexis Jazz to change your behavior to heart and no further admin interaction will be required. Note to others reading this: Please let me know if Tictictoc's behavior isn't changing, and I will consider a block or other appropriate admin measures. ◅ Sebastian 08:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You and i really appreciate your decision. You will not see any Wiki Guideline broken by me in Future. Tictictoc (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. The decision was not just for your sake, but for the benefit of Wikipedia, because nobody doubted that you mean well. There's no need for such a general promise, though. Nobody is perfect, and if you don't dramatize a single mistake, it's easier to recognize it and admit it to the one who made you aware of it, before they feel the need to bring it to the admins' attention. ◅ Sebastian 10:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On second look, you did immediately acknowledge your mistake. It was just unfortunate that so many other mistakes had accumulated that nobody had pointed out sooner. You might want to consider finding an adopter. ◅ Sebastian 10:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, I will consider all my mistakes. And it will not happen in future.Tictictoc (talk) 10:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cashbean

The article Cashbean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. After checking the article's 8 sources and doing a WP:BEFORE search, I could only find 1 source that passes GNG. [1] The other sources were not independent (sounded like press releases) or did not have significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky commando films

Regarding your !vote at this AfD, none of the entries listed are "big budget films." I'd also note that your rationales given at various technical colleges don't have any basis in policy that I can see. If you're going to participate in AfD discussions, you should do more than glance at the article, and be able to link any of your keep arguments to a relevant policy. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Notability Tags

Hi Tictictoc, you recently tagged an article (Elliot Bogod) for notability, Please take this down. I made an effort to include a few links. 103.19.141.1 (talk) 14:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, even though I'm removing the notability tags at your request, I'm also taking down the URLs you gave because they were self-published. Tictictoc (talk) 09:35, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]