Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mr. Bean/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted. (t · c) buidhe 04:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
From a cursory glance, article suffers from sourcing, prose, and neutrality issues. Some texts are tagged as either unsourced or unverifiable, while others are unencyclopedic (I caught one usage of the idiom "taste of one's own medicine", which I have deleted). There could be many unsourced claims in the article due to lack of in-text attributions to RS. Some sources don't seem to be reliable, either; the use of IMDb, which WP:RS/IMDB deems unreliable, is a major red flag. I vote to delist. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 17:56, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - I question the notability of the "London 2012 Olympic Summer Games opening ceremony" section. IW. (talk) 08:25, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Delist. I'm concerned by the substantial amount of non-RS, including IMDb and Metro, both generally unreliable, and also an unsourced paragraph at Mr. Bean#Home media that has some stats, e.g.,
it was originally 52 minutes when broadcast on television
, failing criteria 2b. In the music section, the paragraph opening withThe theme was later released on Goodall's album Choral Works...
is also unsourced. There is additionally a valid cn tag and a valid failed verification tag. The Mr. Bean#In popular culture section might also fail criteria 3b, going into excessive trivia based on questionable sources (1, 2, and The Daily Mirror are not WP:RS. Therefore I am at weak delist. VickKiang (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.