Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5-Hour Energy (cycling team)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

5-Hour Energy (cycling team)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one source. Topic is not notable. Five years from now the article is going to be pointless. Buzzards-Watch Me Work (talk) 02:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep One ref does not equate to non-notable. Suggest the nominator withdraws this and reads WP:BEFORE. Five years from now, 99% of articles will be pointless. So delete them too? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete team does not confer notability just because 1 or 2 team members possess it. Source and author are not clear about how this cycling team meets WP:NOTABILITY--Mevagiss (talk) 12:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A simple search of the cycling press finds plenty of significant coverage: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], etc. Passes WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 14:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes notabilty. --Old Time Music Fan (talk) 21:00, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looks notable. --TMD Talk Page. 21:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as Lugnuts says, only one ref does not equate to non-notable. (if so, a million articles should be deleted) Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 09:12, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.