Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriana Cohen
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:53, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 18:26, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Adriana Cohen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently created as an autobiography, initially written as a pure promotion piece, but that has been toned down by subsequent editing. The person does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. The claim to notability in the article is that the person has been interviewed by various media but the references given are not convincing (a podcast fom CBS Boston, and a very trivial mention in Boston Herald). bonadea contributions talk 08:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I should perhaps add that I have (of course) looked for more references to try and find significant coverage in reliable sources, but failed to do so. Fox News, for instance, is mentioned in the article but I fail to find any mention of Cohen on the Fox News website. --bonadea contributions talk 08:54, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Same here, the references are just passing mentions that don't constitute actual coverage, and some of them don't seem to exist at all. Delete. Specs112 t c 12:26, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication of notability. JoelWhy? talk 13:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I looked at the references and agree with the nominator. The piece on the Boston Herald has nothing to do with any field in which she would reasonably assert notability. I have to say that when I see a biography of someone described as a "publicist" I try to be more rigid about notability but in this case the subject doesn't meet even a low threshold. Ubelowme (talk) 17:39, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Recent edits by a user with a username identical to the article title have removed the claims to notability. bonadea contributions talk 19:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.