Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Haven
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 21:43, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 21:43, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Due to lack of interest and information, this page should be deleted.MgHoneyBee 18:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I Think It's Perfect. There doesn't need to be a lot of imformation due to the fact that Cameron Haven doesn't have a lot of imformation about her. JT111 15:19, 22 August (UTC)
- Comment "Lack of interest" is not criteria for deletion
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. I'm not confident in notability, but I don't typically take part in wrestling AfDs. She hasn't been in the news, and her claim to fame seems to have been being a contestant on a TV show and being in Playboy. --Wafulz 16:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete being a contestant on a small part of WWE television programming isn't notability, nor is being one of many people to have been in playboy or have been a model. MLA 09:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Eusebeus 03:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Being in Playboy is notable enoughLan Di 01:10, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Being part of a playboy spread is not necessarly notable, and this page isn't even close to perfect, a total nn model. Renosecond 23:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. I'm opposing the sudden proposal of seemingly every Diva Search related article for deletion, but this entry is poorly written and made at the moment. I'm going to say Weak Keep for the moment until we can figure out how to properly merge all this contestant information into the Diva Search article.-Umdunno 03:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Has done some minor things, but nothing notable. James Duggan 08:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, completely non-notable. (Just a side note, if we delete everything someone wasn't interested in we'd have nothing here!). Mallanox 12:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Failed contestant, Playboy minor leaguer, not notable. ~ trialsanderrors 07:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.