Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cats and Dogs (game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 23:13, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 23:13, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Deleted (by me) per G12 - Copyright Violation. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 13:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cats and Dogs (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not a notable game, unpublished. Can't see an appropriate speedy category Ged UK (talk) 08:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's WP:IMPERFECT, but inclusion in Klutz Press book does assert a good faith effort at notability. Also [[1]] helps convince me that there's something to it. --Firefly322 (talk) 11:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've found a speedy for it now, as the text is a direct lift from that page. Hope that's not against deletion rules now as i've already brought it here --Ged UK (talk) 11:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Things get speedied on here all the time after AFD has started, especially for copyvio. Congrats on the boardgamegeek link by the way. :) Debate 木 12:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.