Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centibillionaire
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 23:33, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 23:33, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Billionaire. Tone 14:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Centibillionaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable term for wealth. In Google News, no articles have used this word in 2009, though there are a few that have used Centimillionaire. As the term is not in current practical usage, it fails wp:MADEUP and is not useful as an economic term as Trillionaire is far more likely to be used. Ash (talk) 13:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to billionaire, per precedent that centimillionaire redirects to millionaire. Cheers, I'mperator 14:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect; no independent meaning. - Altenmann >t 02:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- redirec/merge I would have messaged the nominator that he could have redirected this without an AfD, and ask him if I could do it now, but he is gone. Ikip (talk) 02:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as suggested by I McMarcoP (talk) 10:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.