Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danzelle Hamilton
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:50, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 02:55, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Danzelle Hamilton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Football player who does not meet notability criteria as outlined at WP:NFOOTBALL and does not have enough coverage to warrant inclusion under WP:GNG. NFOOTBALL requires a player to have actually played in a fully professional league and both soccerbase and BBC show he has not played. Conference leagues are not fully professional. Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton in 2009 and again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton (2nd nomination) G5'd, but this was not created by banned user and probably expanded from 2009 version ClubOranjeT 08:10, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ClubOranjeT 08:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —ClubOranjeT 08:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG, and the comments in the previous AfD's. Suggest WP:SALT - if he becomes notable later, it's easy enough to change Chzz ► 14:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league, and therefore fails WP:NSPORT, and there is insufficient coverage for him to meet WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I agree this player doesn't meet the criteria for his own page and I created this page ages ago while he was with Stoke thinking one day if he makes an appearance for a league team I could move this across, but why has someone gone on to my sandbox and created the page? Jonesy702 (talk) 16:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not this guy again. Nothing has changed. He still hasn't played in a fully professional league, failing WP:NFOOTBALL, and has received no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to pass WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 19:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.