Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doscore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:15, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 14:15, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Doscore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources. The project is fairly young, so it is unlikely there will be extensive third party coverage soon. The account which created the article is named suspiciously similar to the main developer, which probably means someone did not read WP:COI and/or WP:MADEUP. Keφr (talk) 18:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MacMedtalkstalk 17:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheSpecialUser (TSU) 08:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: though selective merge to FreeDOS would be a natural choice, the lack of verifiable material makes this task impossible. – Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 00:19, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete same conclusion as Czarkoff. --Kvng (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.