Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erich Göstl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:38, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Erich Göstl[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & significant RS coverage not found: link. No de.Wiki article. Topped out as a private; did not hold a significant command. Much of the content is sourced to a dubious website: http://www.angelfire.com/nj/ww2/ssrecipients.html The bibliography includes a fringe publication by Huß, Jürgen (2009). Ritterkreuzträger im Mannschaftsstand 1941 - 1945. Zweibrücken: VDM Nickel.

Please also see a note at MilHist Talk Archives. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles on these recipients were redirected to alphabetical lists. In this particular case, the article has been restored from a redirect, but still lacks notability / reliable sources. I don't believe that such sources exist, either in German or English, hence this AfD. For a recently-closed AfD on a Knight's Cross recipient, please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnulf Abele. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to locked redirect - We seem to be collecting these recently.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 01:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - being a soldier and being awarded a medal is not sufficient to support notability.--Rpclod (talk) 18:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.