Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost hunters incorporated
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:13, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:13, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. Rje 00:53, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable thrill seeking group. Also reads like an advert. Woohookitty(meow) 08:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep at least for now - the group seems notable enough, and I'll inform a few editorws interested in paranormal-related groups. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 10:52, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd say delete. Based on the page creator's username (User:Nuekerk) and team founder "Greg Newkirk" name similarities, I'd peg it as a vanity page. LeeNapier 15:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep at least for now. It WAS a vanity page. But since most ghost hunting groups are little more than friends who get together, this one is no different. Besides, researchers are beginning to study the sociological reasons people engage in this 'sport'. This entry may be useful to them. LuckyLouie 17:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Wikipedia is neither a free advertising service nor a storehouse of case studies in sociology. This group is non-notable, receiving 65 (largely self-created) ghits. Their most high-profile outlet is their Myspace page. And as LeeNapier says, it appears as though member Greg Newkirk created the page himself. Bhumiya (said/done) 19:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Bhumiya. A small group making unverifiable claims about themselves is not a viable subject for an encyclopedia article. — Haeleth Talk 20:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unverifiable. Wikipedia is not an advertising service. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 00:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.