Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Front (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 23:21, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 23:21, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 08:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Green Front (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Political party founded in 2007, without national nor regional representation. No notability, nor representation in italian provinces - It's just one of several ecologist parties and one of numberless parties running for next European elections. The english name of this party seems to be fully invented - Invitamia (talk) 11:46, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - I closed the first AfD as "delete" per consensus. Another admin restored the article apparently because the author was not notified of the AfD. [1] So here we are again. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 19:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems a poor response to go against consensus. It's not required that the author is involved or notified, if someone objects to a decision then it can go to deletion review. The first consensus still stands. --neon white talk 00:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Same as last time. — Jake Wartenberg 22:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete according to earlier discussion --Invitamia (talk) 00:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per last discussion...--Unionhawk Talk 02:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The restoration was a mistake in any case, it should have gone to DRV as Neon White points out. Dougweller (talk) 11:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; it is a minor party, but that does not mean it is not relevant. (Point taken, BTW, I'll take it to DRV next time instead.) —Nightstallion 17:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It.Wiki is unfortunately not as good as en.Wiki and there had been many deletions of articles about parties that had parliamentary representation there, so I don't understand how a deletion in it.Wiki can be relevant here. The Green Front is a small party, but is more relevant than many others in en.Wiki: it took part to the last general election within the For the Common Good coalition and I think that we need this article to give complete information about the coalition. --Checco (talk) 07:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "more relevant" is a purely subjective term with little context and is not something that is going to be considered a valid reason to keep. For the Common Good probably fails notability too. --neon white talk 10:28, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and previous Afd ukexpat (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. If the party ever becomes notable then it can be re-created. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 00:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.