Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International High IQ Society
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:52, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 03:52, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 18:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- International High IQ Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Advertising Mark 17:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Reads like an ad to me. Navou banter 19:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Needs some cleaning and such, but it's been linked to on the high IQ society page for awhile last I checked, and i'm sure it can be easily NPOV'd and improved. -- febtalk 19:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Looks notable to me Continue cleanup Lumos3 17:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not seem to me to meet notability guidelines for groups. I see no write ups in 3rd party notable publications.TheRingess 03:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet the guidelines here at Wikipedia no reliable third party sources. Whispering 21:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete slightly advert-like, but more importantly doesn't appear to pass WP:V or WP:RS. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This looks like a thinly-veiled attempt to use a wikipedia article for the promotion of Mr. Haselbauer's books.--OinkOink 20:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. More inclusive than Mensa, so same reasons for retention must apply. --Michael C. Price talk 01:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Second largest IQ society (behind mensa) certainly seems notable to me. The original request for AFD is invalid, "ratio IQ" is no longer used, see:definition of IQ.Tstrobaugh 01:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.