Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Olsen
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:34, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:34, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 04:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
prod contested by author; numerous edits but no real changes to content. Author still says he has had minimal success as a singer which the way I see it equals admitting he is not notable. Author also vandalized page in that she/he removed stub tags, uncategorized page tags, etc. while editing. Postcard Cathy 01:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nuttin' out there but MySpace. Fails WP:BIO. The word "underground" does not have magic qualities that escape normal notability standards. --Dhartung | Talk 02:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability Corpx 02:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BIO - no sources Giggy UCP 03:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per CSD a7. Iknowyourider (t c) 13:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- "...has gained the interest of other musicians & minimal success with airplay on local radio stations." could be construed as a remotely plausible assertion of notability. Morgan Wick 18:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete so other local musicians know who he is, and "minimal success [ie none] with airplay"? This is just another chancer. Come back when you've made it, Kevin. Totnesmartin 21:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- "...has gained the interest of other musicians & minimal success with airplay on local radio stations." could be construed as a remotely plausible assertion of notability. Morgan Wick 18:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- He he I thought the same thing when I prod'd him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.130.181.177 (talk • contribs)
- Delete, could have speedy'd, per db-band, also, per blanked as author blanked page--Jac16888 11:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.