Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolly Badcock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:34, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 17:34, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. No consensus to delete. Malinaccier (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lolly Badcock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable person, who doesn't appear to meet WP:PORNBIO. Tatarian (talk) 21:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet any requirement of WP:PORNBIO. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 22:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Switched vote with addition of major award. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 02:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I added two UK porn awards to the article. That's enough to satisfy WP:PORNBIO for me. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:23, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep by virtue of awards. Also is nom sure this is first time at AfD? I could have sworn she'd been kept previously.Horrorshowj (talk) 06:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because of the awards. - Mgm|(talk) 09:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's no reliable, reputable sources being cited by this article indicating this person's importance, only blogs and commercial sites of questionable repute. krimpet✽ 06:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence that the award she won is a notable award. I won the MVP of the 5th grade intramural flag football league in middle school. My parents have the trophy to prove it. Doesn't mean that I get a Wikipedia article... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Yeah there is. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 06:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Microscopically weak keep per the award but note that the article on the award noted above was created the same day as this nomination but one half hour before it. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's really detailed, yet there seems to be no point to it. TopGearFreak Talk 16:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.