Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miwa Oshiro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Miwa Oshiro

prod was removed because the person is notable in at least four other languages on wiki. Problems with that: 1) Just because they are there doesn't mean she should be. 2) THIS article shows no notability which is why I proded it. I don't care what the other articles say - I care about this article. And this article shows nothing other than the fact that this woman exists and sheer existence is not notable. The article has not been improved in some time and unless it is, I think she should go as nn. Postcard Cathy 11:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless third-party references attesting to subject's notability are found. --Dhartung | Talk 23:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, She has appeared in more than 20 films, She has articles on her in Japanese and Swedish Wikipedia. She is notable.Callelinea 00:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care if she appeared in 3000 films because if they were all direct to video not worth the money to rent them films, then it is not notable. Plus, you are saying that here and not in the article - the article doesn't indicate that. Plus, as I said before, I don't care if she has articles on every wiki out there. That doesn't mean a thing. If there was an article on several wikis that said "Callelina has green hair and orange eyes" and nothing else, would you say that that article should be kept simply because it is on the English, Japanese and Swedish wikis? Cathy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postcard Cathy (talk • contribs)

Delete per nom and Dhartung Giggy _U^CP 09:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as she gets 103,000 Ghits [1]. However, the article does not assert notability. It needs a lot of work, more than may be worth it. Bearian 00:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

same argument I made to Callelina. She could have 1,103,000 hits for all I care but you know most of those are going to be irrelevant or mirror sites. But what is relevant hasn't made it to the article. And that is all that matters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postcard Cathy (talk • contribs)

Delete because even the jawiki version of the article fails to assert notability. Most of her videos do not appear to be notable productions but rather random dime-a-dozen gravure movies. I have my doubts about the notability of Eiken, and the only other appearance listed for her is as a guest on a variety show, which doesn't really constitute non-trivial coverage. Also, those tens of thousands of GHits turn out to be 440 in English [2] and 727 in Japanese/Chinese [3] if you click through to the last page of the Google search. cab 00:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wotta lotta crap. Delete. I wish her no harm, but if she were harmed I doubt that the ambulance crew would look her up in en:WP; as long as they don't, why should we be told her blood group? (Or does en:WP subscribe to this drivel?) Motivation for this "information" aside, how is it related to her "Appearance"? -- Hoary 11:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

COMMENT I don't know why but lot's of bios of Asian people (even Asian fictional characters) have blood types listed. I guess it is a cultural thing.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.